Photo taken at the University of Maine Museum of Art in Bangor, ME
A few weeks ago I received the exciting news that I am one of the recipients of the Heather Heyer Scholarship to attend the Women’s Convention in Detroit, MI next weekend! It is such an honor to be awarded this opportunity—especially as it is in the name of a woman who died tragically while fighting against the hatred and terrorism of white supremacy and nationalism.
However, over the past week I’ve experienced great frustration with many women who have spoken out in anger and pulled their support for this movement because they did not like the decision to invite Senator Sanders to the Women’s Convention. (It seemed) Most outrage came from Hillary Clinton supporters (who, the Women’s March has stated, was invited but cannot attend) who simply do not consider Senator Sanders an ally. Others thought it was a poor decision to invite an older, white man to speak at an event for female equality.
The first complaint makes me angry because they are choosing to stonewall an ally, who also started a progressive movement among people who are looking for more than the establishment has to offer, on the basis that their female candidate of choice lost the race (I was never a Clinton supporter). This is ignoring the fact that the DNC (in my opinion, supported by the evidence of how the mainstream media chose to cover Clinton versus Sanders) never intended to allow anyone else a shot at the party nomination, and that Senator Sanders surprised many within the Democratic Party with the mass support he garnered.
The second complaint holds more clout: was it wise to advertise Senator Sanders, a white, older man, as a key speaker for the Women’s Convention? Probably not. Initially, there was not a lot of specificity in what his role would be, and if I recall, it originally appeared that he was opening the event. However, the feminist movement is not about excluding male supporters and team members. For many of us, Senator Sanders was our candidate of choice. He represented the changes that we wanted to see take place in this country. Truthfully, I was thrilled when I saw that he was going to be at the event.
The bottom line: we do not have the luxury to divide over such a small issue. Feminism is a broad term that encompasses many people (I wrote about this in March) with many views, united by the fact that we believe women deserve equality. However, this movement goes beyond simple equality of women, it focuses on equality for ALL people, regardless of gender, religion, race, culture, etc.
I am attending this event to learn and connect with other people who are in this fight to raise awareness about equality. I am attending as a journalist who wants to learn how to do a better job of reporting and writing about issues that matter. I am attending as a white woman who wants to better understand women of color and the additional challenges they face and who wants to better understand my own privilege as a white woman and how I can use it positively. I am attending as a relational person seeking a community of people who “get it.” Lastly, I am attending for all the women who can’t or won’t—for all the women, young and old, I know who don’t think they need feminism.
I am political—it’s in my blood. I am a passionate person, and I am learning how to channel that into issues of truth and justice, advocating for change. I am excited and ready for this, my first large-scale social justice event, and all it encompasses.
Are you going to be there?